A list of the 50 greatest film adaptations of all time. No Lord of the Rings? Anything else missing?
There are 55 reader comments
• Apr 19 2006 • 9:59AM
Last of the Mohicans (1920) - dir. Maurice Tourner / Though there have been many adaptations of this novel, Tourner's silent version in the 20s is the very best.
• Apr 19 2006 • 10:17AM
its interesting that alice in wonderland is on there. its decent enough as far as movies go but its a poor adaptation. most of the characters are totally bastardised (especially the cheshire cat) and most of the darkness and absurdity have been traded for out and out wakyness. it would be good to know what their criteria really was. Simply quality/popularity or if they really considered the source.
• Apr 19 2006 • 10:27AM
I miss "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" and "The world according to Garp". Both of them would be on my Top 50 list, since they both equal their written counterparts.
• Apr 19 2006 • 10:44AM
"Different Seasons" ought to get bonus points for being the source of two wonderful movies: "Shawshank Redemption" (which they mention) and "Stand By Me" (formerly "The Body"). It's also the source for "Apt Pupil" which I've heard is only OK.
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:00AM
No "Jackie Brown"? For shame!
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:16AM
I'm noticing a distinct lack of West Side Story on that list. For shame, for shame. Also wondering why they included, say, Alice in Wonderland, but left out the Wizard of Oz. Weirdness. Same goes for Silence of the Lambs, Planet of the Apes, and the Princess Bride.
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:20AM
No Adaptation, either.
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:23AM
2001: A Space Odyssey. The book was written by Arthur C Clarke and the film directed by Stanley Kubrik.
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:26AM
Hud. A great adaptation of a not-so-great Larry McMurtry novel
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:38AM
High Fidelity is the only adaptation I have seen where I liked the movie as much as the book.
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:38AM
Tin Drum I second the Wizard of OzWTF!, no The Hustler?
• Apr 19 2006 • 11:40AM
What about "Brokeback Mountain"? Like it or not, the film breathed life and beauty into a very short,
very spare story where not a word of dialogue or description was wasted.
On a less Oscarrific note, I have a soft spot for "Journey To The Center of the Earth" and "20,000 Leagues
Under the Sea" -- they seem hokey by today's f/x standards (hmm, could both be ripe for remake?) but they
capture that lusty, low-tech Jules Verne spirit. "Around the World in 80 Days," not so much.
• Apr 19 2006 • 12:14PM
Double Indemnity.
• Apr 19 2006 • 12:30PM
Brokeback Mountain is in there, though the list is sorted by the name of the source material rather than the
film.
2001: A Space Odyssey (the film) is based on a short story by Arthur C. Clarke, The Sentinel. Clarke wrote
the book while collaborating with Kubrick on the film.
• Apr 19 2006 • 12:30PM
No Chronicles of Narnia...
• Apr 19 2006 • 12:36PM
2001: A Space Odyssey isn't technically an adaptation, because the film's screenplay and the novel were written concurrently, with Clarke and Kubrik collaborating so that the novel's release could coincide with the film's.
I would put Alice in Wonderland on there more for Jan Svankmajer's Alice than for the Disney adaptation.
This list does seem rather odd to me, but there's a lot of popular films that I wouldn't include, mostly because I didn't consider either the films or their source material to be particularly compelling (Lord of the Rings would be left off my list for just that reason).
• Apr 19 2006 • 12:40PM
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.
• Apr 19 2006 • 1:57PM
About a Boy would have been nice to see on the list. But how tripe like Sin City and The Jungle Book beat out The Lord of the Rings is beyond me.
• Apr 19 2006 • 2:28PM
Simply quality/popularity or if they really considered the source.
The article indicated that they considered not only the quality of the film but the quality of its source material, among other things (to my mind that's exactly why LOTR isn't there. Dreadfully dull source material, and visually stunning but otherwise designed-to-make-money fims.)
Sin City was fairly clever, although it wouldn't have made my list... and as much as I enjoy reading Nick Hornby's books (they're light and fun) they, and their filmic counterparts, are essentially Sleepless in Seattle marketed to men.
• Apr 19 2006 • 3:18PM
Slaughterhouse Five
East of Eden
Unbearable Lightness of Being
A Christmas Carol
Christmas Story
Smoke Signals
Accidental Tourist
A Passage to India
The Human Comedy
Quiet American
• Apr 19 2006 • 3:44PM
Fear and Loating in Las Vegas was probably the most true to the book adaptation I have ever seen put to film (and I have seen most of the movies on that list). Gilliam got the literal aspects as well as conveying the "feel" of the book. For shame Guardian!
• Apr 19 2006 • 3:58PM
Quiet American is definitely missing from the list
• Apr 19 2006 • 4:00PM
In Cold Blood (1967) would have been nice to include.
• Apr 19 2006 • 4:03PM
A second vote for the great book turned into pretty great movie High Fidelity. (it has a great soundtrack too)
• Apr 19 2006 • 4:17PM
Another vote for High Fidelity. Also, I think the film A River Runs Through It was better than the book from which it was derived.
• Apr 19 2006 • 4:46PM
The Lion in Winter
• Apr 19 2006 • 4:53PM
"The Man Who Would be King" from the Kipling story should be in there.
Also, "Lonely Are the Brave" from the Edward Abbey novel "The Brave Cowboy". Excelent movie, excelent book.
• Apr 19 2006 • 4:56PM
I was thrilled to see DEVIL IN A BLUE DRESS, SIN CITY, BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY'S, and, THE MALTESE FALCON.
But how could they leave THE CONSTANT GARDENER off the list. I understand that THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD probably eliminated TCG from consideration because they might not have wanted two books from the same author. However, THE CONSTANT GARDENER was a terrific book and a great movie.
Now that DEVIL IN A BLUE DRESS has been recognized as a top adaptation, how long will we have to wait for more Walter Mosley adaptations? It's way overdue.
• Apr 19 2006 • 5:38PM
There wasn't, The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe?
interesting
• Apr 19 2006 • 5:46PM
Robert Altman's The Long Goodbye.
• Apr 19 2006 • 5:58PM
Not that I was a huge fan of the novels, but it seems that V for Vendetta and Sin City were good adaptations. Also, IMO the Great Expectations adaptation was marvelous. Obviously, it was a modernized adaptation and the director definitely put his own twist on the Dicken's classic, but well done nonetheless.
• Apr 19 2006 • 6:04PM
P.S. No doubt will A Scanner Darkly make this list one day.
• Apr 19 2006 • 6:31PM
the list could be clearer. for example, which is the nominated charlie and the chocolate factory adaptation?
• Apr 19 2006 • 7:44PM
How about 'Rogue Male'. A Peter O'Toole gem.
• Apr 19 2006 • 10:21PM
Someone on another site mentioned Gone With the Wind, the exclusion of which seems pretty glaring.
• Apr 20 2006 • 12:32AM
Fight Club
• Apr 20 2006 • 1:10AM
While explicitly mentioned in the article, I still think that Room with a View is a much, much better movie than it was a book.
And while not even coming remotely close to the breadth and scope of the books, Master and Commander was a fine film and a fun adaptation. I even liked it better than LoTR. And Narnia? Please. It should be on the list, along with Harry Potter, of "the 50 most notoriously shallow adaptations."
• Apr 20 2006 • 10:47AM
What about ANYTHING by Ian Fleming? I definitely agree with the people who said High Fidelity and About a Boy. Great realizations of great books.
• Apr 20 2006 • 10:48AM
Frederick Forsyth's "The Day of the Jackal" directed by Fred Minnemann.
• Apr 20 2006 • 10:50AM
Another one that without question should have made this list is Fletch by Gregory McDonald
• Apr 20 2006 • 10:50AM
Oops.
Typo.
Fred Zinnemann that is of course!
• Apr 20 2006 • 10:57AM
There's no Lord of the Rings on the list because the adaptation sucked. Give it time. Those films are not going to be highly regarded in the future, and people thirty years will scratch their heads as to why people liked them.
And I'll agree with an earlier commenter: the Master and Commander film, while not a strict adaptation of any particular book in the series, did a remarkable job of distilling the essence of the books and portraying them on film. O, how I'd love to see a sequel.
• Apr 20 2006 • 11:56AM
Excluding The Grapes of Wrath from this list is a modern day American tragedy.
• Apr 20 2006 • 3:08PM
Requiem for a Dream
Being There
All the President's Men
Dr. Strangelove (based on the book Red Alert)
Ghost World
Jesus Christ Superstar
Lawrence of Arabia (based on Seven Pillars of Wisdom by TS Lawrence)
The Shining
• Apr 20 2006 • 3:20PM
The Shining not being there is a crime.
The Wizard of Oz and Gone With the Wind aren't there either. They aren't my bag, but they are important films.
• Apr 20 2006 • 3:47PM
Naked Lunch
• Apr 20 2006 • 4:05PM
For me, the very best adaption of a book into a movie is Jean-Luc Godard's adaptation of Alberto Moravia's Contempt.
• Apr 20 2006 • 4:20PM
High Fidelity wouldv'e been better of shot in London where it actually took place, a part from that - a great movie.
• Apr 21 2006 • 12:56PM
Even if High Fidelity wasn't shot in London, it was a very good American-ized adaptation. It most definitely still felt the same as the book.
• Apr 21 2006 • 4:15PM
IMHO, Hunt for Red October should be on the list.
• Apr 22 2006 • 5:31PM
"Papillon" seems to be missing.
• Apr 23 2006 • 5:16AM
IMHO, Narnia is a polished piece of shit, but LOTR should be definitely in the list.
• Apr 23 2006 • 12:52PM
Smilla's Sense of Snow was an intense read and a wonderful movie.
• Apr 24 2006 • 8:21AM
The Hours
A River Runs Through It
and, of course, Adaptation (though one could argue it plays fast and loose with the source material - The Orchid Thief - it's just too perfect to omit it from a list like this)
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.
JR McDaniel • Apr 19 2006 • 9:50AM
What, no Less Than Zero! I'm outraged! -smirk-