An Interview With Andor’s Creator, Tony Gilroy
Like many others, I became a little obsessed with Andor over the past few months. I was lukewarm on the first season when it came out, but a pre-s02 rewatch completely changed my tune — I think it’s one of the best things I’ve ever seen on television. Season 2 was almost as good and the whole thing together was really affecting, thought-provoking, and just marvelously well-done.
In this interview with conservative NY Times’ columnist Ross Douthat, series creator Tony Gilroy nails why the show was so interesting:
The five years that I have been given are extremely potent. You have the Empire really closing down, really choking, really ramping up. The emperor is building the Death Star.
They are closing out corporate planets and absorbing them into the state. They are imperialistically acquiring planets and taking what they want. The noose is tightening dramatically.
There still is a Senate. There are senators that are speaking out impotently.
The Senate has been all but completely emasculated by the time this five-year tranche is over.
And there are revolutionary groups, rebellious groups, and people who are acting rebelliously, who wouldn’t even know how to describe themselves as part of any movement. There is a completely wide spectrum of unaffiliated cells and activists that are rising independently across the galaxy.
At the same time, you have a group of more restrained politicians who are trying to make an organized coalition of a rebellion on a place called Yavin, which will end up being the true end of the true victory of the Rebel Alliance.
I wanted to do a show all about the forgotten people who make a revolution like this happen — on both sides — and I want to take equal interest and spend as much time understanding the bureaucrats and the enforcers of the rebellion. I think one of the fascinating things about fascism is that, when it’s done coming after the people whose land it wants and who it wants to oppress and whoever it wants to control, by the time it gets rid of the courts and the justice and consolidates all its power in the center, it ultimately eats its young. It ultimately consumes its own proponents.
The rest of the interview is very much worth a read as well, particularly the bits where, for example, Douthat presses Gilroy on Andor being a “left-wing show”, Gilroy says no, Douthat scoffs, and, sensing Douthat is telling on himself, Gilroy fires back, “Do you identify with the Empire? Do you identify with the Empire?” And Gilroy continues later:
You could say: Why has Hollywood for the last 100 years been progressive or been liberal? I think it’s much larger. I’ll go further and say: Why does almost all literature, why does almost all art that involves humans trend progressive?
Let’s stick with Hollywood. Making a living as an actor or as a writer or a director — without the higher degree of empathy that you have, the more aware you are of behavior and all kinds of behavior, the better you’re going to be at your job. We feed our families by being in an empathy business. It’s just baked in. You’re trying to pretend to be other people. The whole job is to pretend to be other, and what is it like to look from this? People may be less successful over time at portraying Nazis as humans, and that may be good writing or bad writing, and there may be people that have an ax to grind. But in general, empathy is how I feed my family. And the more finely tuned that is, the better I am at my job.
That is what actors do: I’m going on Broadway, I’m playing a villain for six months. I got to live in that. I’m playing the slave, I’m playing the fisherman, I’m playing the nurse, I’m the murderer — you have to get in there. You have to live lives through other people. I think that the simple act of that transformation and that process automatically gives you what I would describe as a more generous and progressive point of view. It just has to.
Like I said, well worth a read/listen. (via sippey)




Comments 5
thread
latest
popular
I went down a Tony Gilroy rabbit hole and watched about 10 of his recent lengthy Andor interviews on YouTube. He's incredibly candid and open about the creative process — hearing him talk about his approach has been as inspiring as any art or design I've seen in the last 5 years.
I've been passing this around in group chats too. It's good because, they are both right, in different ways, but when Gilroy is right, he kinda dunks on Douthat.
I was also lukewarm on Andor Season 1 until a second viewing prior to season 2. When I viewed the slow-burn Season 1 as an allegory to our current political environment and how a rebellion begins, it fascinated me. As a 45 year Star Wars fan, it didn’t give me the dopamine I was used to upon first watch. Now I realize it was giving me something more … and I like all of it! :) Gilroy is a master craftsman. This show is amazing, without lightsabers. I hope the awards recognize this.
Thanks for posting a thorough synopsis. I'm not giving the NYT any clicks these days, so I appreciate that you conveyed the message of the interview.
So Gilroy is one of my favorite creators--Michael Clayton is my favorite movie, plus his work on the Bourne movies and Rogue One and now the brilliant TV series that is Andor. Small moments, realistic moments that reveal fascinating and nuanced characters in hard situations, often of their making. More please and, Jason, thank you for linking to this interview.
But Ross Douthat is so off base in his premise. When asked to explain what the heck he means by “left wing,” he says “you’re telling a story in which basically you’re on the side of the radicals and the revolutionaries.” Hello, history is filled with right-, left- and neither-“wing” radicals and revolutionaries. What an annoying and reductive way to think about a work of art. And his nonsense that progressives are more prone to group think or cancel culture than people on the right? Ugh. Look out the window, man.
The best part is after the absurd bit where Douthat tries to label Michael Clayton as a “left wing” movie because it’s about a corporation poisoning people, and Gilroy just eviscerates him. Go get ‘em, Tony.
Hello! In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
This is the name that'll be displayed next to comments you make on kottke.org; your email will not be displayed publicly. I'd encourage you to use your real name (or at least your first name and last initial) but you can also pick something that you go by when you participate in communities online. Choose something durable and reasonably unique (not "Me" or "anon"). Please don't change this often. No impersonation.
Note: I'm letting folks change their display names because the membership service that kottke.org uses collects full names and I thought some people might not want their names displayed publicly here. If it gets abused, I might disable this feature.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
This thread is closed for new comments & replies. Thanks to everyone for participating!