Princess Catherine on Instagram
“Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing.” Well, I can’t resist the kerfuffle around what’s going on with Princess Catherine. Yesterday she posted a photo of herself with her family that turned out to have been edited, and today she apologized for “any confusion” it might have caused. (Shared presumably in part to dispel rumors about her health and whereabouts, the photo “fans [those rumors] instead,” per the NY Times.)
Last week, Nieman Lab ran a story on how unusual the Palace’s response to gossip surrounding the situation has been. And if you really want to get into the weeds, Nieman Lab’s editor-in-chief Laura Hazard Owen also just linked to a three-minute TikTok video proposing that the original Instagram photo was actually taken last November.
See also Hilary Mantel’s 2013 essay in the London Review of Books: “I wanted to apologise. I wanted to say: it’s nothing personal, it’s monarchy I’m staring at.”
Discussion 13 comments
She has since been spotted... https://people.com/kate-middleton-leaves-windsor-prince-william-private-appointment-hours-after-mothers-day-photo-apology-8607277
Breaking news, must credit Edith Zimmerman!
It's weird they don't????
I do think it's very likely that the photo was from November, but I also don't think that's weird - I don't think there's any expectation not to post an older photo, or even an edited photo, in the current social media sphere (although in her current circumstances it does seem ill advised - she should have just labeled it as a photo from last year!)
I'm also morbidly curious about this. Especially after Covid shutdowns, I can't imagine choosing to take a three month blackout/break from daily life. I suppose she must really, really need it. So, good for her.
It all seems reasonable except that they said that the photo was taken by Prince William in 2024! (“???? The Prince of Wales, 2024”)
The truly bungled PR responses around everything to do with her "disappearance" and William's last minute cancellation of a reading at his godfather's funeral (a last minute cancellation is something the previous generation of royals would never do, so it's notable) and whatever is going on with him, has been fascinating to watch. Besides cutting ribbons, PR and well timed photo ops are the royal family's actual job.
Between reviewing all the Oscar's fashion and now this Royals photoshop bonanza, I'm not sure how I'm supposed to get any work done today.
Ok Nieman Lab is obviously my preferred resource for this topic. I also enjoyed their latest: https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/03/the-worlds-wire-services-call-out-british-palace-pr-for-a-royally-doctored-photo/
The thing that struck me with the photo (who knew I even cared?!!) was that she was seated. It made me think maybe she wasn't well enough for a standing or "action" family photo.
Helen Lewis, QAnon for Wine Moms:
This whole situation and the above quote reminds me of that wonderful profile of Tom Cruise, by Caity Weaver, which I was certain came to me via Kottke.org. But a quick google showed me that I’d need other search terms and success was only achieved with “tom cruise profile lives in england private helicopter can’t meet him for an interview,” in case that whets an appetite.
Note that in the apology post, "C" does not actually state that they edited the photo.
Catherine announced that she's undergoing treatment for cancer — we wish her a speedy recovery.
As for all the speculation, I agree with Michael Hobbes:
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
This is the name that'll be displayed next to comments you make on kottke.org; your email will not be displayed publicly. I'd encourage you to use your real name (or at least your first name and last initial) but you can also pick something that you go by when you participate in communities online. Choose something durable and reasonably unique (not "Me" or "anon"). Please don't change this often. No impersonation..
Note: I'm letting folks change their display names because the membership service that kottke.org uses collects full names and I thought some people might not want their names displayed publicly here. If it gets abused, I might disable this feature.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!