Mark Zuckerberg On '60 Minutes'  CHOIRE SICHA  ·  JAN 14 2008

Lesley Stahl of '60 Minutes' did a big piece last night on Facebook and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg. (It followed Anderson Cooper's horrifying story on rape in Congo and the spillover of Rwandan terror into the country; unreal.)

The worst part (about 3 minutes in, on the online video) came when Stahl said Facebook was the new Google. "You seem to be replacing [Google co-founders] Larry and Sergey as the people out here who everyone's talking about," she said. Zuckerberg didn't say anything. "You're just staring at me," she said, almost immediately. "Is that a question?" he asked her. Then: "We were warned he could be awkward," she said in a voice-over. Actually no, Lesley, that was a savvy response to a terrible, no-win question.

Read more posts on kottke.org about:
60minutes   andersoncooper   Facebook   Google   xisthenewy

There are 21 reader comments

TheHonJudgeSmails21 14 200810:21AM

Less rape, more funny!

Good work so far - you are missed over at Gawker!

Tom Dolan23 14 200810:23AM

Terrible question and fairly terrible interview, which I don't think left Zuckerberg looking too good. Despite all the success (and kudos for it) I'm not sure if he came off as a horse that one should be betting on at this point in the game. Savvy yes, but the Beacon fiasco shows that any 23-year-old CEO has too learn a few things the hard way. And BTW, Facebook is not displacing Google anytime soon, except in Leslie's head maybe.

Ryan Imel29 14 200810:29AM

I'm glad others noticed the horrible question and how his response was not "awkward". If anything, Zuckerberg was very natural and authentic compared to Stahl.

Nerdsavant42 14 200810:42AM

I had the same response. Every time they said "Facebook is the new Google," I just sat there staring for a minute or two. Really? The new Google? Really? Are we talking about the same Facebook?

Mitch43 14 200810:43AM

Stahl had no place doing that interview. She might have read anything and everything she could get her hands on, but it obviously wasn't enough.

narnio54 14 200810:54AM

I think Stahl just ruined the 'mom test.'

Gavin35 14 200811:35AM

What's interesting here is that LStahl keeps getting all these high profile tech interviews (MySpace, Google, TPerkins). Is she the hippest reporter on staff? Where's Ed Bradley?

Also, can someone please start an Andy Rooney vlog? That shit on umbrellas last night needs to be talked about in a deep and meaningful way.

Keith T55 14 200811:55AM

Either you are a moron, or that was an unfunny Ed Bradley joke.

Ben26 14 200812:26PM

That interview was terrible. He's a 23 year old Harvard graduate running a massively popular company. The entire beginning of the interview sounds like she's talking to an 11 year old. So condescending and idiotic.

Ben28 14 200812:28PM

Okay a Harvard dropout, but still. She's all, "Look it's a computer with some Internets isn't this novel?"

Chip47 14 200812:47PM

The entire interview was awkward and he looked uncomfortable.

Ken50 14 200812:50PM

LStahl was also wrong when she said, "You're not an alum of Harvard. You didn't graduate!"

Hey, princess, anyone who attends a school is an alum of that school, even if they don't graduate. Way to do your homework.

Nick Husher14 14 2008 3:14PM

I can only think that the right answer to Ms. Stahl's statement was, "You think so? Huh." In sort of a dismissive way.

Imagine you've created and are successfully marketing the first radio ecosystem and an interviewer muses, "You seem to be replacing Gutenburg as the information media guy everyone's talking about." Clearly, radio isn't going to replace the printing press, anyone who thinks as much has a fundamental misunderstanding of both radio and print. The same is true with Stahl's comment about Google v. Facebook.

slinkimalinki57 14 2008 3:57PM

i think it's more of an "umbrellas are the new chromatographic spectrometers" analogy.

llomo04 14 2008 5:04PM

sorry this isn't stahl- or facebook-specific

i'd just like to take this opportunity to bemoan the terrible terrible ads on 60 Minutes
you would think that only people senior citizens tune in to that show
what is wrong with the neilson ratings - cbs ad staff that they have no idea their audience includes intelligent people in their thirties and fortires who dont yet need depends diapers?

Jenguin14 14 2008 7:14PM

Regardless of the content of his answers - he needs some serious media training. I don't care how old you are - if you're running a business (and a "going to take over Google apparently" one at that - heh) you don't say "type stuff" in your response.

You know, that type stuff makes me cringe. ;)

I might have poor grammar in casual conversation, but on 60 Minutes? C'mon.. Media Training!!

Charles Follymacher44 14 2008 7:44PM

There's lots of ways he could have handled that question. Some variation of the following would work out just fine:

"Well, it was pretty exciting at first, but we've gotten pretty used to it now and we're just trying to focus really hard on building a really useful site and enhancing user experiences. Y'know, as long as they're still talking about our company ten years from now, I don't mind one bit." {laughs}

Staring at the camera, waiting for a specific question actually shows a lack of savvy. It indicates a lack of experience with how pop interviews work and/or a refusal/inability to play the game. He came off a little dodgy/defensive. Still it was basically a fluff piece, it's not like Yahoo'll drop their offer down to $100M because of it.

Charles35 14 2008 9:35PM

Ken,

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+alumni&btnG=Google+Search


A graduate is one who has a degree from a particular institution.. You're wrong.

Robert01 15 200810:01AM

That was a very awkward interview on both sides, a old-school media outlet trying to look hip and Mark coming off as a coder with an attitude. I would suggest a business coach for him, especially if he goes public and gets a board he has to report to. He's not Shaun Fanning, I'm sure some people on the board would want to show him the door.

John07 15 2008 9:07PM

Charles

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=alumnus

Actually, you are wrong. To be an alumnus you only have to have attended an institution. No need to graduate.

John

haydesigner12 17 2008 2:12AM

Robert showed proof.
John showed none.
Guess who won.

This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.

kottke.org

Front page
About + contact
Site archives

Subscribe

Follow kottke.org on Twitter

Follow kottke.org on Tumblr

Like kottke.org on Facebook

Subscribe to the RSS feed

Advertisement

Ads by The Deck

Support kottke.org shop at Amazon

And more at Amazon.com

Looking for work?

More at We Work Remotely

Kottke @ Quarterly

Subscribe to Quarterly and get a real-life mailing from Jason every three months.

 

Enginehosting

Hosting provided EngineHosting