Advertise here with Carbon Ads

This site is made possible by member support. πŸ’ž

Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.

When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!

kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.

Beloved by 86.47% of the web.

πŸ”  πŸ’€  πŸ“Έ  😭  πŸ•³οΈ  🀠  🎬  πŸ₯”

Re the Patagonia vs. Pattie Gonia case: the company should sponsor her environmental efforts and part of that is a trademark agreement where each side compromises a little bit; Pattie can keep doing her thing and Patagonia is seen as an ally again.

Comments  2

Sort by: thread β€” thread . latest . faves

K
Kapuku

I do not understand why Pattie agreed to not use her drag name in "any product", vs simply agreeing to not use the logo. That sounds like a bad deal for her, but it seems like that's what the parties mutually agreed.

Jason KottkeMOD

Getting a lot of pushback on social about Pattie being the one who's mucking up the works here (e.g. see replies on Threads). I'm not really interested in who's "right" here; I just feel (naively perhaps) that fighting about trademarks legally and publicly is not a good look for either party and that there should be a way for everyone to get back on the same "side" again. Americans love their litigation tho.

Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.

Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.

Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!