Advertise here with Carbon Ads

This site is made possible by member support. 💞

Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.

When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!

kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.

Beloved by 86.47% of the web.

🍔  💀  📸  😭  🕳️  🤠  🎬  🥔

Art is valuable precisely because it is not easy to create. We are interested in art, in any and all of its forms, because humans made it. That’s the very thing that makes it interesting; the who, the how, and especially the why.”

Comments  3

Sort by: thread — thread . latest . faves

Nicolas Magand

I like this. It somehow reminds me of this great quote by Malraux: “One can like that the meaning of the word ‘art’ is to try to make men aware of the greatness that they ignore in them.”

A
Almost

This line was fantastic (as ambivalent as I am about the term "creatives"):

AI will never fully displace creatives, because the moment AI can mass-produce any kind of creative work at scale, that work will stop being worth producing in the first place.

Like how the artwork of Miyazaki is being actively reduced and flattened by AI and its disciples, and Altman et al. encourage such destructive behavior. Right now, above our heads and below our feet, the pushers of the agentic rankle at the singular and the unique.

L
Lauren Siegmann

I disagree. Art is not hard to create. What is hard to create is a complex social system of explicit and implicit standards that are interlinked with culture, class, and capital.

This thread is closed for new comments & replies. Thanks to everyone for participating!