A new Lord of the Rings movie will premiere in theaters on Dec 17, 2027. It’s the first of two films that will focus on Gandalf, Aragorn, and Sauron searching for Gollum.
This site is made possible by member support. 💞
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
Beloved by 86.47% of the web.
A new Lord of the Rings movie will premiere in theaters on Dec 17, 2027. It’s the first of two films that will focus on Gandalf, Aragorn, and Sauron searching for Gollum.
Comments 5
thread
latest
popular
As someone who read the Silmarillion and many other post-LotR books and compilations and so forth, I still have to ask WHYYYYYYY. Oh, right, money. I wonder if there's any possibility it will feel worthwhile.
If it’s anything like the Hobbit movies, not only will it suck, but will detract from the films that preceded it. Somehow the Hobbit made LOTR seem retroactively worse.
There is an edit of the three Hobbit movies that slices out all the non-book stuff and winds up being a far better experience. That said I kinda liked the Necromancer stuff but it was far from necessary.
Oh, the Hobbit movies were bad for so many reasons, not just for jamming in all that Silmarillion/Appendices stuff that had a wildly different tone to The Hobbit. The over-reliance on CGI was just awful. The orcs in Fellowship STILL give me anxiety. The orcs in The Hobbit were laughable in how fake they looked. Such a massive disappointment three times over.
I'd love for them to return to the practical effects we saw in the LotR films and not the laughable CGI we saw in the Hobbit (also, why was that three films? Why is this one two?). Honestly, whichever one had the dwarfs in barrels in a river has the distinction of being one of the few movies in my entire life that I did not finish.
*And yes, i know LotR had plenty of CGI.
Hello! In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
This is the name that'll be displayed next to comments you make on kottke.org; your email will not be displayed publicly. I'd encourage you to use your real name (or at least your first name and last initial) but you can also pick something that you go by when you participate in communities online. Choose something durable and reasonably unique (not "Me" or "anon"). Please don't change this often. No impersonation.
Note: I'm letting folks change their display names because the membership service that kottke.org uses collects full names and I thought some people might not want their names displayed publicly here. If it gets abused, I might disable this feature.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!