When I tell folks (like during my XOXO talk) that I’m leaving a lot of money on the table by not paywalling my stuff on Substack, this is what I’m talking about: “You probably can’t make more than $1 million a year on Substack. But Matthew Yglesias does.”
Advertise here with Carbon Ads
This site is made possible by member support. 💞
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
Beloved by 86.47% of the web.
Comments 4
I find it a little ironic that an article about putting things behind a paywall is behind a paywall.
The article blows by the fact that substack guaranteed him $200k the first year. They were motivated to *promote* him. The hundreds of thousands of other people trying to make money on Substack don't get that promotion.
I think you have this backwards. It was Yglesias that was promoting Substack (and, incidentally, leaving a lot of money on the table in the process).
Substack is an example of the 80/20 rule. Let's presume it's perfectly true for writers who are writing consistent content and trying to earn money on Substack. 20% of the writers there make 80% of the revenue, which means 80% of the Substack writers are fighting for crumbs.
Of that 20% of writers making 80% of the income, 20% of THOSE writers are making 80% of that income. So, you have 4% (20% of 20%) of writers on Substack making 64% (80% of 80%) of the income writers are generating there.
Let's do it again. 20% of that upper 4% are making 80% of the 64% slice reserved for the top writers. So, you have 0.8% (20% of 4%) of the writers on Substack making 51.2% (80% of 64%) of the income there.
In other words, more than half of the revenue earned by writers on Substack go to less than 1% of the writers on there.
Basically, for every Matt Y., there are more than 100 writers trying to make it on Substack and earning crumbs.
Hello! In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
This thread is closed for new comments & replies. Thanks to everyone for participating!