Fun little word game: Alphaguess. “Guess the word of the day. Each guess reveals where the word sits alphabetically.” (Today’s puzzle took me 16 guesses…is that good?)
This site is made possible by member support. β€οΈ
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
Fun little word game: Alphaguess. “Guess the word of the day. Each guess reveals where the word sits alphabetically.” (Today’s puzzle took me 16 guesses…is that good?)
Discussion 28 comments
Took me 16 as well. I'll be curious to try this a few more times to see if it's possible to improve on that number in any meaningful way.
Assuming you're using binary searching (which is optimal), it takes on average log2(n) steps to find an item in a sorted list of n items. Assuming a word list somewhere between 5,000 and 20,000 words (as a reference Wordle accepts as possible answers something like 10,000-12,000 words), then an optimal search will take 12-14-ish steps, on average.
Not particularly helpful for any given day, but that's the overall ballpark.
Also 16. I think I could have improved by 1 with experience (forgetting about huge chunks of words of a certain pattern) and improving by another 1 by not "giving up" at the end (surely there are no more words I can think of beginning with...).
The math also checks out- the fastest search is a binary search and 2^14 is 16384 words. I think they would only use common English words so tens of thousands makes sense to me. As a comparison, Wordle uses a little over 2000 words, but those are limited to only 5 letter words.
EDIT: Zachary commented Wordle accepts 12000 words (my 2000 are the answers only). I'd say 12000 is a better number to use, which increases my estimate by a bit- I'd guess the total wordlist is 2^15 or more likely 2^16 words. So 16 should be the maximum (some days you'll get there more quickly).
13 guesses. That was surprisingly fun! After 2 or 3 turns, I thought of this semi-related video (which, weirdly, I think about regularly). I wonder what the most efficient strategy is here.
Like git bisect, but for words! My score was 8, but I sweated it: over 3 minutes. I think both scores might be interesting for what they reveal about puzzle-solving personalities.
I got 16 but I wasn't very strategic and made one dumb mistake near the start. I'm going to try it for a few days and see if it stays fun.
Speaking of new word puzzles. Give Gisnep a try. You guess the quote and the quote source.
http://gisnep.com
That was fun! IDK whether my time was goodβand I get so sick of games that insist on recording times and "streaks." Why can't I just play the game without the artificial competition aspect overlaid upon it?
14.
14 as well.
I wonder how it would play if there were harder bounds on the words, like only 5 letter words.
Same.
It took me 20. π¦
Also 16! Wild.
11. 3m 25s.
I'm on team 11 too, at just over 2 minutes.
13 today. 4m 6s.
16 :-)
I got it in 9 but I think knowing 16 was a common number might have influenced my first guess?
𧩠Puzzle #429
π€ 9 guesses
β±οΈ 1m 39s
π alphaguess.com
𧩠Puzzle #429
π€ 15 guesses
β±οΈ 8m 23s
Interesting idea, could be much better design wise, and find a way to help with the alphabet. Too much of the ABC song going through my head π
𧩠Puzzle #429
π€ 12 guesses
β±οΈ 3m 42s
π alphaguess.com
𧩠Puzzle #429
π€ 15 guesses
β±οΈ 6m 23s
π alphaguess.com
I believe it said you must use Scrabble words, which could be up to ~280,000 possibilities?
11 for me with one unnecessary guess (already ruled out). 2 min 55 seconds. That was fun!
12! Too fun! Reminds me of a game my son and husband used to play called "Guess my number" between 1 and 1,000,000 - you had to respond with uber far, super far, very far, close or something like that
This is nearly identical to a game called Guess My Word that launched in April 2019, which was itself inspired by a daily web game on Simbase.org that dates back to at least 2015.
My wife and I have played this game for years on road trips. Good fun.
In before the NYT buys this one, too.
As Andy mentioned, this game is identical to Guess My Word with one notable exception: no public leaderboard. The top of the leaderboard at Guess My Word is your usual mix of exploits and cheats but below that group you get to see the truly weird ways people free associate words. some guess paths truly read like poetry and some will make you literally LOL.
The words have mostly started with 's', which is making the game decidedly less fun.
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
This is the name that'll be displayed next to comments you make on kottke.org; your email will not be displayed publicly. I'd encourage you to use your real name (or at least your first name and last initial) but you can also pick something that you go by when you participate in communities online. Choose something durable and reasonably unique (not "Me" or "anon"). Please don't change this often. No impersonation..
Note: I'm letting folks change their display names because the membership service that kottke.org uses collects full names and I thought some people might not want their names displayed publicly here. If it gets abused, I might disable this feature.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!