An Open Letter to Wyna Liu, the New York Times’ Connections Editor. “But on those days when I don’t solve it… well, let’s just say those are dark days. I don’t sleep properly anymore. I can’t eat.”
This site is made possible by member support. ❤️
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
An Open Letter to Wyna Liu, the New York Times’ Connections Editor. “But on those days when I don’t solve it… well, let’s just say those are dark days. I don’t sleep properly anymore. I can’t eat.”
Comments 12
thread
latest
popular
Speaking of, today's puzzle was hard, yes? For some reason it took me forever to get even the first row.
It was hard but I got it. I never feel cheated by Connections; if I fail it's because I've been outsmarted not done in by a bad clue.
I agree that the Connections puzzles are usually very well-crafted in that there's only one obvious solution. It may be very well hidden and riddled with red herrings, but it's there. But there have been a couple that didn't work that way, which was frustrating. All in all, Liu is doing a great job.
Yes. I gave up and then only went back to it after seeing that others thought it was hard too. Got it, but ... tricky.
(Mild spoiler alert!) I would not have gotten today's if I didn't already have a post-it on my desk that said, "always see if the first syllable is saying something."
Yes, today's was unusually difficult and the fact that the Connections Companion rated it as only a 2.8 difficulty added insult to injury.
"The carefully arranged word placement forcing us to see your misleading phrases." Is this real, or do I imagine that the starting position is deliberately misleading? I often quickly click Shuffle before I can even read it. But, a case could be made that whatever words in the top row that they are trying to trick us with are more likely to each belong to a distinct category.
Damnit. And I thought I was sooo clever for immediately clicking ‘shuffle’ before looking at the words.
The starting arrangement IS deliberately misleading. Liu has said so before. (Though I can't find the article right now.)
See also the Chabon Method for solving Connections.
Just being a math jerk, when you are down to the last eight words, there are only 35 options, unless you are worried about finding blue before yellow or whatever.
Reminds me of the Otis Lee Crenshaw (Rich Hall) Scrabble Song. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piQQxuWixww
Hello! In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
This is the name that'll be displayed next to comments you make on kottke.org; your email will not be displayed publicly. I'd encourage you to use your real name (or at least your first name and last initial) but you can also pick something that you go by when you participate in communities online. Choose something durable and reasonably unique (not "Me" or "anon"). Please don't change this often. No impersonation.
Note: I'm letting folks change their display names because the membership service that kottke.org uses collects full names and I thought some people might not want their names displayed publicly here. If it gets abused, I might disable this feature.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!