Advertise here with Carbon Ads

This site is made possible by member support. โค๏ธ

Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.

When you buy through links on, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site! home of fine hypertext products since 1998.

๐Ÿ”  ๐Ÿ’€  ๐Ÿ“ธ  ๐Ÿ˜ญ  ๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ  ๐Ÿค   ๐ŸŽฌ  ๐Ÿฅ”

They’ve got answers

Just noticed the other day that Google switched their “definition” link from to When I first saw it, I was irritated about the switch, but after I realized that is a better resource, my irritation lasted about two seconds. On one page, they list not only the definition of a word, but also the thesaurus entry, the Wikipedia entry (if applicable), translations into more than 10 languages (including Greek, Arabic, Chinese, and Hebrew), and some related topics. They’ve even got pages for terms that doesn’t have, like “snoop dogg”. And for a word like “reaganomics”, brings in info from Investopedia, a useful-looking financial information site.

Walter Mossberg recently profiled in the WSJ. I wonder if the folks from Google read this (or had seen previously…more likely) and thought, hey, we should be linking to these guys instead of The cynic in me feels like money had to have changed hands in order for this to have happened (maybe Google is an investor in GuruNet, maybe GuruNet paid for that placement), but the optimist in me says that Google is still a weird little company where the members of project teams can stumble across a better resource that will make their users happier and more productive and implement it on the live site quickly, even if the company that provides that resource could be considered a competitor. Would love to know which it is.

Update: it’s the user experience, by a landslide.