Advertise here with Carbon Ads

This site is made possible by member support. โค๏ธ

Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.

When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!

kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.

๐Ÿ”  ๐Ÿ’€  ๐Ÿ“ธ  ๐Ÿ˜ญ  ๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ  ๐Ÿค   ๐ŸŽฌ  ๐Ÿฅ”

Cory Doctorow’s riff on branding and trademarks

Cory Doctorow’s riff on branding and trademarks. Trademarks went from protecting consumers to protecting brands.

Reader comments

StephenNov 06, 2004 at 2:12PM

I think you meant to use the permalink for that article, not the home page.

I find it really interesting how brands become synonymous with a product they make, sometimes because they were the first to do it, but other times because they become the most popular brand in their field. Kleenex and Google are two examples of this phenomenon

ryanNov 06, 2004 at 5:18PM

"Genericness" I believe is the legal term for that. I disagree with all of this business about the decline of branding, btw. I think the success of chains like Zara and H&M has more to do with bang for buck than lack of prestige or name value (H&M, though cheap, is still infinitely more respectable than a chain like Old Navy - and Zara is pretty far from being a no-name or "non-brand").

Aaron SittigNov 06, 2004 at 10:57PM

The term I've heard is 'Genericide'.

http://www.legal-definitions.com/IP/genericide.htm

This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.