A vote for kotte.org is actually
A vote for kotte.org is actually a vote for kottke.org (and freedom!). I’m no longer in the running
This site is made possible by member support. โค๏ธ
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
A vote for kotte.org is actually a vote for kottke.org (and freedom!). I’m no longer in the running
Reader comments
megnutDec 05, 2003 at 3:26PM
And a vote for megnut.com is a vote against kottke.org! But that doesn't mean it's a vote against freedom. It's also a vote for freedom. Vote megnut!
jkottkeDec 05, 2003 at 3:32PM
A vote for megnut is a vote for Nader. Don't let Little Green Nutballs win because you voted for megnut.
megnutDec 05, 2003 at 4:49PM
You're sleeping on the sofa tonight for that one.
jkottkeDec 05, 2003 at 4:57PM
Whatever, Ralph.
AnilDec 05, 2003 at 5:01PM
I hate it when mom and dad fight. But you're right, Meg is the Nader of the blogosphere.
BenDec 05, 2003 at 7:17PM
Pah! I'm still waiting to be recognised as a blogger (sort of). Also slightly ironic that Africa Blog is up for best looking blog...
KevinDec 05, 2003 at 9:55PM
Thank you for fixing the link.
justdannyDec 06, 2003 at 12:03AM
interesting your link to the poll was set up such that clicking your link to it counted as an automatic vote for you.
i reached the poll from a link at LGF and did'nt vote for LGF. i guess you don't give the people who visit your site that option.
and as for your site, is it really a blog ? reads like a dinner and dancing review and looks like a really bland mid 70's jr high school text book.
dtettoDec 06, 2003 at 12:11AM
The link does not automatically vote for kottke. Look at the URL -- it just points to a target on the page, there's no extraneous code. I clicked and did not vote for kottke.org until I viewed the results and saw LGF ahead -- now I'm not going to contest that Kottke reads like "a dinner and dancing review" (I wonder, does "The New Yorker" read like a dinner and dancing review? Because I've never read a dinner and dancing review but it seems like that what you're getting at) -- but I'm not about to let LGF win.
jtDec 06, 2003 at 3:41AM
but I'm not about to let LGF win
Because then the terrorist have won!!!
Please. Its a stupid poll, a popularity contest. Meaningless.
edwardDec 06, 2003 at 5:42AM
justdanny: ... i reached the poll from a link at LGF ... as for your site, is it really a blog ? reads like a dinner and dancing review ...
The terrorists now have won. (tm)
I can see the four horsemen from my window.
PeteDec 06, 2003 at 6:08AM
Anything to stop LGF winning.
Anything.
charlie boyDec 06, 2003 at 9:18AM
yuo linked to VILE ESREAL HATAR howerd zin, also NOISY PUBLIC SCHOOL BOY tom yerke, stupid DUM MOONYBATS All of yuo
mehdiDec 06, 2003 at 6:51PM
hi
it is home of hyper text product!
mehdiDec 06, 2003 at 6:52PM
sorry! i mean! hyperlink! :)
dtettoDec 07, 2003 at 2:10AM
(I have no idea what the last three posts mean.)
dan willisDec 07, 2003 at 9:08PM
I like what charlie boy had to say. I wish I'd said it first.
colonel panicDec 08, 2003 at 4:23PM
vile anti-semite!
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.