Digitally retouching a bikini model’s photo
Digitally retouching a bikini model’s photo. Check out the archive for more examples and don’t believe anything you see in magazines
Advertise here with Carbon Ads
This site is made possible by member support. ❤️
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
Reader comments
MattAug 09, 2003 at 1:23PM
This guy's had a chubbygut removal
BrianAug 09, 2003 at 4:47PM
Why wouldn't they have simply hired a hotter model to begin with?
JosephAug 09, 2003 at 4:59PM
Probably because an ugly(er) model plus the cost of retouching is less than the cost of the hotter model.
EmilyAug 09, 2003 at 6:18PM
But does any woman seriously look as "hot" all over her face and body as airbrushed photos? The bottom line is that it's unrealistic; all about projecting a fantasy image.
asdfAug 10, 2003 at 12:48PM
What's up the the nose family? Is that real? A joke? They all got nose jobs? Anyone? It's freakign me out.
rafterAug 10, 2003 at 6:47PM
They've all got false noses attached to their faces, and Greg apparently has made them look authentic.
I'd like to know the context of some of these ads/whatnot, though -- why does Pixar have so many dark, dark shots they need lightened? Why not render it right in the first place?
Antony HareAug 11, 2003 at 5:10PM
I especially enjoyed the digital retouching of the CAT shoe. Again, it struck me as strange that a scuffed shoe was photographed at all, but Greg's (Photoshop?) skills are, indeed, excellent.
fdsaAug 11, 2003 at 6:22PM
Actually, I think she is pretty hot (untouched) --- anyone photographed so closely will have his/her pores and smallest of blemishes accentuated.
PaulAug 11, 2003 at 11:41PM
The bad lighting on her face was the biggest problem I had with the original.
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.