Can you tell if these images are fake or foto?.
Reader comments
Aug 05, 2003 at 10:28AM
it's not that difficult really, if you start looking for imperfections. dust on the chess pieces, jagged tips of grass blades, tiny bubbles (heh) in the wine...
the cg is just too *perfect*. the only cg on the entire quiz that was worth even half a damn was the shot glass in the bonus round -- and i blame that on the crappy jpeg compression -- the artifacts were throwing me off. i'll admit, the dice almost stumped me too, but the top right dot on the 6 side of the left die.. see it?
Aug 05, 2003 at 12:18PM
I got 7/10, I have a good grip on reality, I don't need to see my therapist.
I'm colourblind, that's my excuse.
Aug 05, 2003 at 2:50PM
9/10 here - The big pile of nails was just too far away to really see enough detail. I agree with one of the previous statements - CG is still just too perfect. If (when?) we are able to introduce natural imperfections in the CG we create, then the game might be another story. :)
Aug 05, 2003 at 3:08PM
I'm going to blame it on not trying too hard (ha!), but I only got 5/10. My attention to detail isn't what it u
Aug 05, 2003 at 4:42PM
...sed to be.
Aug 05, 2003 at 5:34PM
I got 9/10 first time... those nails fooled me. I got 4/4 on the bonus. Their right, the CG's usually had no natural imperfections. No dirt, perfectly smooth surfaces.
Aug 05, 2003 at 7:20PM
that shot glass got me virtually buzzed. nice job.
Aug 05, 2003 at 9:57PM
well i feel like a loser with my 6/10. but i didn't sleep last night. the nails were good.
Aug 06, 2003 at 6:16PM
8/10, the nails fooled me, but I was 50/50 on the wet table and chair, the filter effect seemed too sharp.
Only 2/4 in the bonus round, I also blame the crappy quality of the glass image.
Aug 07, 2003 at 5:08AM
9/10. I didn't have trouble with the nails, it was the glass tumblers i got wrong.
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.
Ryan SchroederAug 05, 2003 at 10:09AM
9/10 right, missed the blue glasses of water.