The Decline of Fashion Photography, an argument in pictures  JAN 09 2004

The Decline of Fashion Photography, an argument in pictures.

There are 9 reader comments

frigg43 09 2004 1:43PM

"After Newton came heroin chic. The grunge aesthetic taken to its logical extreme, this trend offered us 13-year-old sleep-deprived anorexics in desperate need of real clothing."

Neat link to an insipid piece of writing. "After Newton came ..." Egads...historical inaccuracies, vapid generalizations, silly thesis...comparing auction prices of a vintage Penn print and a contemporary LaChapelle...golly...where to begin...

Maybe she'll do better next year when she gets into high school.

tj hooker59 09 2004 3:59PM

I thought it was pretty well-written. I didn't agree with everything she had to say (I like Helmut Newton), but she had good points, particularly about the unfortunate encroaching of "celebrity status" as it relates to photographers.

Josh15 09 2004 4:15PM

A) She didn't seem particularly harsh on Helmut Newton, and b) it seemed perfectly well-written. What about this was silly?

99000025 10 200411:25AM

will Steven Heller please come and make a comment?

Patrick44 11 2004 8:44AM

Fashion and photography are separate arts. Kinda like music and video, dontcha think?

mendel40 11 2004 8:40PM

I suspect you could use the same selection of photographs to argue precisely the opposite argument, or anything in between.

donald tetto43 11 200410:43PM

The juxtaposition of the first two really struck me as a strong "argument in pictures" -- but thereafter it shifted to more "an argument in text (with accompanying pictures)." It kind of meandered then, but the conclusion was well taken. Patrick, your point is an interesting one, but that is why the article doesn't critique any fashion or compare it to photography, but only the genre/field of fashion photography. (One of my favorite books of photography is a collection of Louise Lawler's photos of [non-photographic] artworks (in museums, in homes, in storage]).

frigg32 13 2004 2:32AM

Again...this is one of the most dim-witted pieces of writing I've ever encountered.

This silly person compares photographs of fashion with fashion. An essay about fashion photography somehow manages to establish criteria for BOTH, happily ignoring the difference between these arts.

She glides seemlessly from dismissing Helmut Newton to casting aside the work of early-90's designers, laying blame on the models and work of the artists who made the clothes, prefering a different aesthetic.

One of the shittiest pieces of writing I've ever completed. Pure vapid garbage.

BTW, donald, lawler did a bunch of photos documenting the placement of contemporary photos, as well. You'd probably like them, they're awfully fine, although, having met her, she might disagree with THAT word.

rg35 13 200412:35PM

Reminds me of a quote from Wim Wenders (introduction to Sylvia Plachy's Signs & Relics) - "Whoever came up first with that saying 'a picture is worth a thousand words' didn't understand the first thing about either one."

This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.

kottke.org

Front page
About + contact
Site archives

Subscribe

Follow kottke.org on Twitter

Follow kottke.org on Tumblr

Like kottke.org on Facebook

Subscribe to the RSS feed

Advertisement

Ads by The Deck

Support kottke.org shop at Amazon

And more at Amazon.com

Looking for work?

More at We Work Remotely

Kottke @ Quarterly

Subscribe to Quarterly and get a real-life mailing from Jason every three months.

 

Enginehosting

Hosting provided EngineHosting